Sparrowhawks, Bats, & Foxes: The Fruit of Festival Park



Entering the petite Festival Park the other evening, I saw a fox slink away into the undergrowth, and wondered what wonders laid beneath that brush. I also wondered at how an ecosystem like Festival Park establishes itself, and settles into a healthy living system. As I jogged through the park, I stopped jogging, and started listening. It was the twilight hour, where there was more darkness in the sky than light, but just enough light to make out silhouettes of birds and beasts, and bats. I listened to the dusk chorus of small birds reverberate around the circus of tall trees, and I thought to myself, What a magical place!  I saw bats flitting quickly above my head in and out of the treeline. I even imagined that in those dark brooding ponds, one almost a marsh now, there is a multiculturalism of biodiversity, and of life in all its fascinating forms.

I also wondered if the park would then become a target for developers, who see nothing of what I see, who see this 'park' as simply a park from a very limited perspective, that's to say, a space to walk your dog, a space to walk through or have a chat, but emphatically a human-centred space that humans do not use. And if humans do not use it, then what's the point?
But of course, this park does not belong to us humans. It belongs to the wood pigeons, the magpies, the pipistrelle bats and fiery foxes, the indigenous life-forms who have made it their home. It belongs to the birch trees, the couch grass, the irises and orchids, the insects and the gulls that have grown up here, that use this space as a shelter, a feeding station, a place to communicate and coordinate, a place to breathe and live. To these creatures this space is home in the deepest most profound way.

Development looms however. And nothing is ever safe from the claws of developers who see little of the microcosm that exists here, and its benefit not just unto itself but to all who come into contact with it.

The cost of progress - the cost of control - is that we have now reached a point where we are out of control. Like an avalanche, humans can no longer control their direction. They think they can, but they can't. What is happening in effect is that the avalanche is occasionally redirected in a slightly different direction, but the end point is the same: down, until it hits a wall, or slumps into the earth, spent.

'Build bridges not walls', read the banner across the Clyde the other day for Trump's presidential inauguration.

How about we just stop building altogether? 

It's the building that has caused us to lose control.

Construction is simply the more sinister side of destruction. It conceals its destruction beneath a veneer of decor and pebble dash, beneath a skin of glass and steel, beneath its vampiric sucking of the earth's energies. Beneath banners that tell us how considerate construction companies are...

But construction is rarely considerate, at least in the man-made world where his homes are not nests, but closets and filing cabinets that impact and press down upon the earth.

The paradox reveals the path.

No progress, no control. No construction.

Just being natural. Just natural being.

Using what nature provides without synthesizing it or chemicalizing it, without leeching, and bleaching the earth with our waste.

It is to this end that I shall build a home made of light...

Save our wild spaces and you save the world.




Earth-bonding & The Sacred Marraige

The word pact goes way back, ultimately from the proto-Indo-European root pag- meaning to fix or to make firm. 

It strikes me that the pact between man and his environment has now become 'impact', and that loose fixing man used to have with nature, a fixing that did not require tightening but which revelled in its looseness, has now become so utterly sealed and unyielding as to renege on the original natural pact.

To be sure, all creatures impact, but man is the only creature to impact in an unnatural way, introducing toxicity into the lands and seas by way of his chemical and scientific (which is not conscientious) tinkering. When a beaver alters its environment it does so in a wholly natural way, even though this might include a certain devastation by way of flooding, and by extension, the killing of other plants and animals.

When man alters his environment, invariably, he does so with an unnatural hand, in other words with machines, which not only usurps man's vital energy but which usurps also and more significantly man's vital synergy with the land he seeks to destructure. The result of this is impact: an impinging of the land and its entities by man, and a loss of the natural binding that keeps man and land together.

In terms of impact, we have slavery, the earth as man's slave.

In terms of pact, we have harmony, the earth as man's better half.

We are all married whether we like it or not, and the sooner we embrace the ancient Celtic practice of marrying the land, the better for all. 

http://upliftconnect.com/marrying-the-land/


The Three Gibbones


Ever since my father saw the 1990 film Coupe De Ville in which a father lures his three estranged sons back together by telling them he needs a car delivered, a year has not passed without me hearing him use the phrase 'The Three Gibbones' which the father in the film uses to describe his wayward and mildly eccentric offspring.

To be sure, we three sons (only two of which feature here, the third being estranged still), are not your conventional lot, much to the initial disappointment of our father, but he has gotten around that now, the brainwashing that his poor little brain had undergone...

That being said, we are still the three gibbones... (maybe... nay, especially, with our father included) !






























The Three Gibbones in Little Italy..  Glasgow outside, Italy inside!


How Green is Your Valley


So there it is, Glasgow is the second greenest city in Britain after Edinburgh with approximately a third of the city-space given over to green spaces. Notice how they had to include 'Greater' London in order to find any green at all...

I would actually go one farther and say that Glasgow is the greenest. After all, if you did enlarge the area to include 'Greater' Glasgow you would immediately start scooping up the great ranges of the Kilpatrick Hills, The Campsie Fells, and The Renfrewshire Moors which would increase the percentage remarkably.

Indeed, it would be interesting to map the same geographic area of Greater London here onto Glasgow and see how much extra there is beyond what they have represented here as Glasgow. And how much that percentile would increase from the stated 32%.

Here is the article here:

https://www.theguardian.com/cities/gallery/2017/jan/05/green-space-uk-largest-cities-mapped?CMP=fb_gu







Glasgow Nobody


I've always been interested in seeing unpopulated cities.... or vessels and containers devoid of their 'filling'. The city is a curious entity no doubt, and it seems ever more curious when you have the space and silence (outwith the grubbing about of demented shoppers and office workers) to contemplate it. 

I have always wanted to document the city without its people, especially in Glasgow's case since People Make Glasgow. I've always wondered what Glasgow would look like without people. It's the paradox that attracts me. Like the desert spending most of its time in sub-zero temperatures...

Perhaps seeing the city without its people, like seeing the desert outwith its heat, will provide a cooler perspective within which to develop the necessary insight...

The post title, incidentally, comes from the Japanese book Tokyo Nobody by Masataka Nakano...
































Bossing it in the Gallowgate...

Let Glasgow Flourish


The human being is a flower, that much is certain... a flower that flourishes from the great plant and planet that it is a function of....

Flowering is a matter of creativity.... Creativity a matter of being aligned, being attuned to this greater context of plant-ness (or indeed, planetariness). The word 'planet' itself means to flow, to wander. A flower is something that flows. Flowering a function of flowing.

Some people never flower because they've allowed their selves to become embedded and embroiled in a portfolio of actions that has little bearing on their greater context of aliveness, on their flowing.

Flowering is a matter of aliveness, a matter of responsiveness, even of responsibility...

Movement is everything. It alters the spatio-temporal field. It alters Mind.

The universe is, one might argue, a great flower, blossoming forth from The Big Bang. 

Planet Earth a mere petal...